![low fps ati radeon hd 3400 series low fps ati radeon hd 3400 series](https://www.it-bazar.cz/upload/4711-1301327156_v.jpg)
- LOW FPS ATI RADEON HD 3400 SERIES PATCH
- LOW FPS ATI RADEON HD 3400 SERIES WINDOWS 7
- LOW FPS ATI RADEON HD 3400 SERIES SERIES
- LOW FPS ATI RADEON HD 3400 SERIES WINDOWS
I run Skyrim, for example, at all "ultra" settings and it hovers around 40 frames at the worst. That said, I've never experienced issues with this relatively new chip in any other game than this one. Yes, that's been said in this thread, and I recognized as much in my first post.
LOW FPS ATI RADEON HD 3400 SERIES SERIES
If you search google for any game and the AMD FX Series CPU's you'll see that for every game people are having major issues with them. Which is why your system isn't working properlyįor gaming. Because AMD went backwards with the technology in them. The AMD FX CPU Series are garbage for gaming. Your computer is too old for this to work as it requires the new Hyper-Transport link and your mother board is still using the Frount-Side-Bus.
LOW FPS ATI RADEON HD 3400 SERIES WINDOWS
Yes I know my CPU, Mobo and RAM are all a giant bottle neck but do we all have to have a Windows Experience Index of 7.4 to enjoy this game? I'm not gonna turn off the firewall or virus protection.
LOW FPS ATI RADEON HD 3400 SERIES WINDOWS 7
Gonna streamline Windows 7 next and turn off all unnecessary background programs and Windows options next. OS Version: Microsoft Windows 7 Home 64bitįrame Rate before ATI Tray Tools was about 12, now about 14.īeen through this machine, all new mobo drivers, all Catalyst options set to performance, power configuration set to performance, game options set to lowest, V-Synch turned off, not playing in windowed mode, and monitor set to the lowest possible resolution.
![low fps ati radeon hd 3400 series low fps ati radeon hd 3400 series](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/i/332206452712-0-1/s-l1000.jpg)
Maybe a frame or two faster but I must stress that maybe. Game is bottlenecked by processor.Įdited by Nashidaran, 01 December 2012 - 03:42 AM.ĭid not really do anything for me. I've tried disabling crossfire to just use the dedicated card, and using the thermal efficiency that gives me to overclock up to 2.9GHz, but FPS is not as good.Įdit: Tested some settings. Set it to 2 and FPS dropped nearly by half, so my system seems to be using all 4 cores.įPS is 30-40 at match start, drops to 20-ish when I look around, drops to 8-20 in engagements, particularly when lots of missiles are in the air near me. Tried playing with the Multi Thread settings in Tray Tools after enabling it and setting threads to 4 changed nothing.
LOW FPS ATI RADEON HD 3400 SERIES PATCH
Every major patch has consistently, bit by bit, reduced my FPS further to the point that it is once again barely playable. So with nothing apparently maxing out, what could the bottleneck be?ĪMD Quad-Core A6-3400 (1.4 GHz overclocked to 2.3 GHz and undervolted)Ĭards seem to be working fine in Crossfire, which I turned on a couple of patches ago when, like so many others, my FPS dropped significantly after patching.
![low fps ati radeon hd 3400 series low fps ati radeon hd 3400 series](https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2012/12/N1sK3.jpg)
Again, the GPU stayed at about 30% maximum, and RAM usage never got above 30%. It did seem like the game was using all 6 cores, and at no point did any core get to 100%. I took someone's advice and ran HWinfo and MSI Afterburner to monitor the CPU, RAM, and GPU. I retried overclocking to 3.8GHz (from 3.3), set everything to low, set the process priority to high and the affinity to all six cores, and was getting numbers that made the game playable, ie. This was my next step in tonight's attempt to remedy the FPS issue a little and make the game playable. Several major lags when trying to hit a fast target at close range suggests much lower FPS in action. Yup, even after optimizing Windows 7, the average frame rate was right around 14 with the lowest I saw at 8, (this was out of combat).